Pentode Phono
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:54 am
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
Pentode Phono
JJ and I have been looking at this for a while and the goal is a Cheap phono that uses RC correction that kicks buttocks.
One of the goal is to try to do the whole thing with shunt filtering and somehow by tweaking things I came up with this.
It sims nicely in the frequency domain but the thing that bothered me was the load the pentode sees gets vanishingly low at high frequency. The loss of gain at the large load is actually part of the correction.
I had a back and fourth with stephie and i figured it would go better here.
One of the goal is to try to do the whole thing with shunt filtering and somehow by tweaking things I came up with this.
It sims nicely in the frequency domain but the thing that bothered me was the load the pentode sees gets vanishingly low at high frequency. The loss of gain at the large load is actually part of the correction.
I had a back and fourth with stephie and i figured it would go better here.
- Attachments
-
- Basic circuit. Ultimately this will direct couple to another tube.
- Screen shot 2010-02-06 at 3.29.26 PM.png (20 KiB) Viewed 49928 times
-
- Load seen by the D3A
- Screen shot 2010-02-05 at 7.29.38 PM.png (22.1 KiB) Viewed 49928 times
-
- Frequency response.
- Screen shot 2010-02-05 at 7.30.37 PM.png (28.65 KiB) Viewed 49928 times
Get Your Fix
www.hifiheroin.com
www.hifiheroin.com
Hiya,
Funny you mention this - I was just helping my cabinet maker buddy put together a very simple phono stage using... D3a,
Very interesting! May I ask why only shunt filtering? Less evil resistance in the filter path and strong drive for the output stage?
I don't have a good feel for how optimal loading of pentodes should work - nor how a harmonic profile which is a function of frequency will sound. Then again, extra distortion at HF may not be a huge issue if the harmonics are ultrasonic...
Will have to sim it and see how much current the tube is going to swing at HF. My one concern is ticks/pops may be a bit problematic (see Morgan's phono stage chapter on these exciting HF cartridge resonance)
Either way, delighted to see we can benefit from Stephie's wisdom again.
Cheers
Funny you mention this - I was just helping my cabinet maker buddy put together a very simple phono stage using... D3a,
Very interesting! May I ask why only shunt filtering? Less evil resistance in the filter path and strong drive for the output stage?
I don't have a good feel for how optimal loading of pentodes should work - nor how a harmonic profile which is a function of frequency will sound. Then again, extra distortion at HF may not be a huge issue if the harmonics are ultrasonic...
Will have to sim it and see how much current the tube is going to swing at HF. My one concern is ticks/pops may be a bit problematic (see Morgan's phono stage chapter on these exciting HF cartridge resonance)
Either way, delighted to see we can benefit from Stephie's wisdom again.
Cheers
Pops and ticks will be more pronounced for certain. The problem is partly gain distribution. At 10kHz, Dave's circuit, as shown, runs out of drive somewhere between 100-200mV at 10kHz applied to the inverse RIAA input. That's reasonable HF headroom, but not spectacular. You can gain back more HF headroom by running the pentode at higher current... not higher power, just higher current.
Don't forget, from a distortion view, pentode's love low load impedances.
On me being back. You know how hard it is to shut up a broad, right?
-Stephie
Don't forget, from a distortion view, pentode's love low load impedances.
On me being back. You know how hard it is to shut up a broad, right?
-Stephie
Hey Stephie,
Keep talking all you want!
I hear you regarding the current... I must keep remind myself how good a vertical loadline can look with a pentode at blistering currents.
When I get a chance, I may try and sort out a sim with E55L (I think the US # is 8233)... that should be happy running at 50mA, for a gm of about 50-55. Have to reinstall Spice and all the library stuff first though as having some problems with it...
Cheers
Keep talking all you want!
I hear you regarding the current... I must keep remind myself how good a vertical loadline can look with a pentode at blistering currents.
When I get a chance, I may try and sort out a sim with E55L (I think the US # is 8233)... that should be happy running at 50mA, for a gm of about 50-55. Have to reinstall Spice and all the library stuff first though as having some problems with it...
Cheers
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:54 am
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
OK peoples.
I'd like a bit more current and bias on the 5687 (or whatever tube ends up there) so maybe another 50-100V of B+ will be needed. I was hoping to get away with a Genrad 1203 to make things simple and keep the PS out of it for some (ie me) hence the 300V.
We are actually looking at the russian 6E5P as the pentode. I used the D3A because it was a model I was familiar with.
I also still find the idea of the variable gain of the pentode with load as part of the filter really interesting.
Last thought is I wonder how much the iriaa having 15dB of gain from 20Khz -100Khz is making things look worse than they really are. (I don't have my head around this one yet)
dave
I'd like a bit more current and bias on the 5687 (or whatever tube ends up there) so maybe another 50-100V of B+ will be needed. I was hoping to get away with a Genrad 1203 to make things simple and keep the PS out of it for some (ie me) hence the 300V.
We are actually looking at the russian 6E5P as the pentode. I used the D3A because it was a model I was familiar with.
I also still find the idea of the variable gain of the pentode with load as part of the filter really interesting.
Last thought is I wonder how much the iriaa having 15dB of gain from 20Khz -100Khz is making things look worse than they really are. (I don't have my head around this one yet)
dave
- Attachments
-
- cheap pentode 3.asc
- (5.24 KiB) Downloaded 613 times
-
- Screen shot 2010-02-07 at 9.19.48 PM.png (53.75 KiB) Viewed 49889 times
Last edited by dave slagle on Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get Your Fix
www.hifiheroin.com
www.hifiheroin.com
Hi all,
Gotta say, the more I think about the pentode/shunt scheme, the more I like the idea.
I have very little time this week to play, but just wanted to throw in some ideas for consideration:
1) Tube choice
Input could also be E280F, and maybe worth investigating the Russian 6J52P... apparently a bit like their version of the D3A. Haven't had time to investigate fully but there's a thread on diyaudio and a warning about dodgy sellers...
Then could save the 6E5p for the output stage.
2) Speaking of the output stage...
Could consider running a 5687 (or 6E5P) long tail pair on the output stage and avoid the 47uF cathode cap, stacked supply etc. Would give you polarity switching etc.
3) If we want to get really crazy... I have to check the phasing of this, but it could be that the other grid of said long tail pair might provide a nice point to inject (frequency equalised) B+ rail noise sample into the output, which would probably require removing the PS decoupling between stages. Inspired by Broskie's stuff that.
4) Speaking of noise, it wonder if might be better to return some of the RIAA shunt to B+ instead of ground. Again, haven't had time to think about this properly and do some sims.
In any case, getting very excited about the possibilities here. Wouldn't surprise me if this thing killed the LCR - how's that for fighting talk!
Hope to have more time to spend on this soon...
Gotta say, the more I think about the pentode/shunt scheme, the more I like the idea.
I have very little time this week to play, but just wanted to throw in some ideas for consideration:
1) Tube choice
Input could also be E280F, and maybe worth investigating the Russian 6J52P... apparently a bit like their version of the D3A. Haven't had time to investigate fully but there's a thread on diyaudio and a warning about dodgy sellers...
Then could save the 6E5p for the output stage.
2) Speaking of the output stage...
Could consider running a 5687 (or 6E5P) long tail pair on the output stage and avoid the 47uF cathode cap, stacked supply etc. Would give you polarity switching etc.
3) If we want to get really crazy... I have to check the phasing of this, but it could be that the other grid of said long tail pair might provide a nice point to inject (frequency equalised) B+ rail noise sample into the output, which would probably require removing the PS decoupling between stages. Inspired by Broskie's stuff that.
4) Speaking of noise, it wonder if might be better to return some of the RIAA shunt to B+ instead of ground. Again, haven't had time to think about this properly and do some sims.
In any case, getting very excited about the possibilities here. Wouldn't surprise me if this thing killed the LCR - how's that for fighting talk!
Hope to have more time to spend on this soon...
Dave
Post the .ASC file. The DC is creaping due to clip at HF. Please annotate the nodes, it helps figure out what you're measuring. Here's a slightly altered spice file. Note that R11 is a lot higher.
Stephie
Post the .ASC file. The DC is creaping due to clip at HF. Please annotate the nodes, it helps figure out what you're measuring. Here's a slightly altered spice file. Note that R11 is a lot higher.
Stephie
- Attachments
-
- cheap_pentode_modified.asc
- (5.92 KiB) Downloaded 589 times
Hey JJ,
You mentioned causing trouble... I like to do that too.
That should certainly work; I'd be curious about the noise at these levels, and actual dynamic shunt impedance of the VR tube may be comparable to that of the small cap at HF and affect the EQ... just guessing here. That's why I though a long tail pair stage at the output could be interesting, though I suspect your scheme has the potential for better sound. I won't go into level shifters and servos for the same reasons... esp. given the target audience for the design.
I gave Clips a shout last night and we diagnosed some of the issues above - the dc for example was ameliorated by running the sim longer - probably the time constant on the output. Dunno why the dc initial conditions biz in Spice didn't do the trick... also must get my installation fixed so I can try and replicate/play
You mentioned causing trouble... I like to do that too.
That should certainly work; I'd be curious about the noise at these levels, and actual dynamic shunt impedance of the VR tube may be comparable to that of the small cap at HF and affect the EQ... just guessing here. That's why I though a long tail pair stage at the output could be interesting, though I suspect your scheme has the potential for better sound. I won't go into level shifters and servos for the same reasons... esp. given the target audience for the design.
I gave Clips a shout last night and we diagnosed some of the issues above - the dc for example was ameliorated by running the sim longer - probably the time constant on the output. Dunno why the dc initial conditions biz in Spice didn't do the trick... also must get my installation fixed so I can try and replicate/play
For the initial conditions to work right, do a DC analysis, noting where the operating point IS, then set the voltages and currents with an .IC statement. Then you don't need to worry.
On the VR Tube. Getting the bias right is going to be very tricky. As the D3a bias point shifts (if only by volts, which is normal) the bias on the second stage will change substantially, which is likely to alter the sound. Think of it this way... we're asking for a high gain circuit. If the DC gain is also high (direct coupling and fixed biasing) then the bias points are also subjected to that same high gain. Transformers (I can't use the abbreviation any more, since that means something altogether different to me now- giggle) and / or capacitors avoid that issue.
-Stephie
On the VR Tube. Getting the bias right is going to be very tricky. As the D3a bias point shifts (if only by volts, which is normal) the bias on the second stage will change substantially, which is likely to alter the sound. Think of it this way... we're asking for a high gain circuit. If the DC gain is also high (direct coupling and fixed biasing) then the bias points are also subjected to that same high gain. Transformers (I can't use the abbreviation any more, since that means something altogether different to me now- giggle) and / or capacitors avoid that issue.
-Stephie
Hey Dave,
Don´t know why I haven´t seen this thread. Low-budget is fun!
To make it even simpler you could use the russian triode/pentode 6F12P. Both halves with S=20mA/V and the triode with mu=100.
The one, with lost the same type of EQ, I´ve been working on for quite a while, is full of sand with a "gyrator"-loaded DHT 3A5(Oh, so cheap) on top and a pair of 2SK170 at the bottom. No second stage needed(gain=40dB) as signal is taken at the lowZ output of the "gyrator". Finally I´ve ordered the PCB´s so it will not be long until it plays.
About cracks and pops this is not a problem IRL. Have used the cascoded version with E88CC(B+=300V) of this for a very long time together with AN IO and AN S-7 former.
Don´t know why I haven´t seen this thread. Low-budget is fun!
To make it even simpler you could use the russian triode/pentode 6F12P. Both halves with S=20mA/V and the triode with mu=100.
The one, with lost the same type of EQ, I´ve been working on for quite a while, is full of sand with a "gyrator"-loaded DHT 3A5(Oh, so cheap) on top and a pair of 2SK170 at the bottom. No second stage needed(gain=40dB) as signal is taken at the lowZ output of the "gyrator". Finally I´ve ordered the PCB´s so it will not be long until it plays.
About cracks and pops this is not a problem IRL. Have used the cascoded version with E88CC(B+=300V) of this for a very long time together with AN IO and AN S-7 former.
Brgds
Lars
Lars
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone, UK
And like Lars, I have no idea how I missed this thread. The comment from Shines is very relevant for me as that is what I run at present. See attached. I did it as I only had a 5mA LL1660 tx hanging about and wanted to hear what it went like getting rid of the parafeed output stage.That's why I though a long tail pair stage at the output could be interesting, though I suspect your scheme has the potential for better sound.
I've been messing around with a shunt version in SPICE as well and have a version which I thought worked very well. But reading Stephie's comments about overload, bias shift etc may mean it isn't so good after all. Think I need to look/learn a bit more.
- Attachments
-
- riaalowzeqbalout.asc
- (8.97 KiB) Downloaded 499 times
-
- riaa20100325.gif (97.99 KiB) Viewed 49593 times
Hey Stephen,
Great thread this, and the LTP looks nice.
But I thought the mission here was a Cheap phono .
About your circuit I think you might miss the point a little as you have added a series resistor, R16. I understand it though, as loading is tuff.
My theory, after having lived with this kind of EQ for many years, is that the lack of the above is what makes it play so great. There might be drawbacks with high loading at the highest frequencies but it is after all a compromise. And it plays music.
Will go home at my lunchhour and post a single pentode hybrid RIAA that I sketched on yesterday. Unfortunately gain will not reach 40dB.
Great thread this, and the LTP looks nice.
But I thought the mission here was a Cheap phono .
About your circuit I think you might miss the point a little as you have added a series resistor, R16. I understand it though, as loading is tuff.
My theory, after having lived with this kind of EQ for many years, is that the lack of the above is what makes it play so great. There might be drawbacks with high loading at the highest frequencies but it is after all a compromise. And it plays music.
Will go home at my lunchhour and post a single pentode hybrid RIAA that I sketched on yesterday. Unfortunately gain will not reach 40dB.
Brgds
Lars
Lars
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone, UK
Hi Lars,
I got a bit carried away when I saw a phono thread and the LTP comment and posted what I was currently using
From scratch, I agree mine won't be cheap but it was cheap for me as the output tx was just lying around on the shelf I've often thought if I got rid of it, I could have a second cheap phono lying around for funs.
Attached is the shunt phono I've been messing with. Not sure I fully understand pentodes which is why I was a bit apprehensive posting my sim as the biasing looks a bit strange to me but the AC part seems to work well at low level. I have to look at Stephie's comments to see how they look in this circuit but not sure just yet how to look at bias shift, HF AC overload and the like in the sim. Lots more to learn
I got a bit carried away when I saw a phono thread and the LTP comment and posted what I was currently using
From scratch, I agree mine won't be cheap but it was cheap for me as the output tx was just lying around on the shelf I've often thought if I got rid of it, I could have a second cheap phono lying around for funs.
Attached is the shunt phono I've been messing with. Not sure I fully understand pentodes which is why I was a bit apprehensive posting my sim as the biasing looks a bit strange to me but the AC part seems to work well at low level. I have to look at Stephie's comments to see how they look in this circuit but not sure just yet how to look at bias shift, HF AC overload and the like in the sim. Lots more to learn
- Attachments
-
- riaa20100325a.gif (111.42 KiB) Viewed 49588 times
-
- riaaparaeqbalout.asc
- (8.14 KiB) Downloaded 535 times
Hey Stephen,
About pentodes (or cascodes) there are no secrets about the way they work:
Zout is ideally infinite.
Gain is defined as Gm*Rload, the same for AC or DC. Lets say the anode resistor is 10k and Gm=10mA/V, gain is 100=40dB. As Zout isn´t infinite IRL, Ri must be parallelled with Rload when calculating gain.
To linearize and add some local feedback the cathoderestor can be left unbypassed to some degree. At the same time this makes Ri higher.
Some of our friends here with deeper insight, surely will have a lot more to tell.
About pentodes (or cascodes) there are no secrets about the way they work:
Zout is ideally infinite.
Gain is defined as Gm*Rload, the same for AC or DC. Lets say the anode resistor is 10k and Gm=10mA/V, gain is 100=40dB. As Zout isn´t infinite IRL, Ri must be parallelled with Rload when calculating gain.
To linearize and add some local feedback the cathoderestor can be left unbypassed to some degree. At the same time this makes Ri higher.
Some of our friends here with deeper insight, surely will have a lot more to tell.
Brgds
Lars
Lars
Back to the "El Cheapo"-concept.
If one can accept some sand on top and 34dB gain we can do with only the pentode.
I am not so sure the load should be so heavy, so in this one it is around 5kohm at 1kHz. So now we don´t have so close to a short at 20kHz.
Ah, why don´t go for 40dB as below.....
If one can accept some sand on top and 34dB gain we can do with only the pentode.
I am not so sure the load should be so heavy, so in this one it is around 5kohm at 1kHz. So now we don´t have so close to a short at 20kHz.
Ah, why don´t go for 40dB as below.....
- Attachments
-
- d3ahyb.PNG (67.49 KiB) Viewed 49638 times
-
- D3ahyb.asc
- (5.54 KiB) Downloaded 548 times
Last edited by reVintage on Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brgds
Lars
Lars
Hey guys,
Did some simple THD-sims of the 36dB circuit above.
With the rev-RIAA removed and all at 1kHz I checked with:
51k load ie the loading at 20Hz=56dB gain: THD=1%, input level 100mV
4,6k//51k load ie the loading at 1kHz 36dB gain: THD=1%, input level 800mV
420ohm load ie the loading at 20kHz=16dB gain: THD=1%, input level 300mV
All levelsare peakr.
Have anyonre checked the unequalized max-levels at different frequencies from a typical PU?
Did some simple THD-sims of the 36dB circuit above.
With the rev-RIAA removed and all at 1kHz I checked with:
51k load ie the loading at 20Hz=56dB gain: THD=1%, input level 100mV
4,6k//51k load ie the loading at 1kHz 36dB gain: THD=1%, input level 800mV
420ohm load ie the loading at 20kHz=16dB gain: THD=1%, input level 300mV
All levelsare peakr.
Have anyonre checked the unequalized max-levels at different frequencies from a typical PU?
Brgds
Lars
Lars
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone, UK
Hi Lars,
I didn't have an IRF610 model handy so subbed an IRF510. That might have led to a problemette. I ended up with a lot of current down the valve; about 45mA and so about 12W dissipation. Is that what you get?
I also messed about with my para EQ circuit and found it very sensitive to G2 volts. As such, with the values I've chosen, in particular the cap values (not willing to go larger) I think it a non-starter as it would be very susceptible to valve variation and therefore probably ageing.
I didn't have an IRF610 model handy so subbed an IRF510. That might have led to a problemette. I ended up with a lot of current down the valve; about 45mA and so about 12W dissipation. Is that what you get?
I also messed about with my para EQ circuit and found it very sensitive to G2 volts. As such, with the values I've chosen, in particular the cap values (not willing to go larger) I think it a non-starter as it would be very susceptible to valve variation and therefore probably ageing.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone, UK
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:54 am
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Folkestone, UK
Went looking through some schemos on the pooter, found Jim Hagerman's SKP (Simple Killer Phono) which uses an E280F in pentode and shunt EQ. Not sure if the circuit is on the public domain though. Bit more traditional WRT coupling and biasing.
That's quite a departure from you trad build style. How's that feel? Look forward hearing the reception you guys get with it.
cheers,
Stephen
That's quite a departure from you trad build style. How's that feel? Look forward hearing the reception you guys get with it.
cheers,
Stephen
-
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:54 am
- Location: NYC
- Contact:
it sounds good. I don't have anything to compare it to at the moment but next weekend at the LSAF i'll put it up against Jeffrey's LCR and the Artemis labs PH-1 with teflon caps and nickel outputs.
dave
dave
Get Your Fix
www.hifiheroin.com
www.hifiheroin.com
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 8:01 am
- Location: Denbigh, North Wales